Everyone once in awhile, you encounter a piece of clickbait to which the only possible response is: And such is the case with this week’s header, via Town & Country Magazine (?!)*, “New Evidence Suggests Jane Austen Was Poisoned to Death.” Sadly, if you actually read the article, (1) it’s a very flimsy theory based mostly on her reading glasses suggesting she had cataracts and (2) it’s more likely to have been ~ambient~ arsenic poisoning (arsenic: the original asbestos) than deliberate murder. But, for a brief pearl-clutching moment, a bright and glorious world of cozy murder opened up to us wherein Jane was murdered and it fell to Cassandra to solve the crime and like LOOK you just know you want to read the shit out of that book. It gives a whole new life to the
Only the Week's Most Erudite Clickbait
Only the Week's Most Erudite Clickbait
Only the Week's Most Erudite Clickbait
Everyone once in awhile, you encounter a piece of clickbait to which the only possible response is: And such is the case with this week’s header, via Town & Country Magazine (?!)*, “New Evidence Suggests Jane Austen Was Poisoned to Death.” Sadly, if you actually read the article, (1) it’s a very flimsy theory based mostly on her reading glasses suggesting she had cataracts and (2) it’s more likely to have been ~ambient~ arsenic poisoning (arsenic: the original asbestos) than deliberate murder. But, for a brief pearl-clutching moment, a bright and glorious world of cozy murder opened up to us wherein Jane was murdered and it fell to Cassandra to solve the crime and like LOOK you just know you want to read the shit out of that book. It gives a whole new life to the